User talk:Multichill

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:BotMultichill)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Always busy.

Bahasa Indonesia  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  română  español  português  English  français  Nederlands  polski  galego  Simple English  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  ქართული  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Welcome to my talk page. Use it; don't send me e-mail.

I reply to messages left on my talk, on my talk page. If I left a message on your talk page, I will reply there (unless you specify otherwise).

File naming (discussion of 2010)[edit]

Hi Multichill, thanks for your bot, that's a great help. But I still have a question regarding Commons:File naming. This proposed guideline is mentioned to be under discussion since 2010, and you started the discussion. The text of the guideline has evolved since the discussion began, and it's still only a proposed guideline not an official guideline. Its also not really harmonious with Commons:File renaming which already is an official guideline, so uploaders can oppose a rename of a file name that does not describe the content of the file. I found an uploader who prefers a date, the uploaders name and ambigious numbers and this also ok, but then this should be mentioned. Currently the proposed guideline says Names should be descriptive, chosen according to what the image displays or contents portray. Now some files can get more descriptive filenames and others not as File renaming also says, the uploaders requests can be respected. This is not really necessary, but of course if the rules would be clear from the outset, many discussions wouldn't even start. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:20, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Starr 071227-1073 Washingtonia sp..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 15:29, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Campaign office - Flickr - Al Jazeera English.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:12, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 08:16, 17 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Julianadorp vlag.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Larshei (talk) 13:37, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:The "Mubarak as vampire" poster.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:55, 23 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files with hidden categories only[edit]

Hi Multichill! Would it be possible to use your bot to scan Category:Flickr images reviewed by FlickreviewR 2 for files/images that only contain hidden categories, and tag them with {{subst:unc}}? There seemes to be a lot of them… Anders (talk) 20:31, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Anders: technically probably yes, but I stopped running bots like that quite some time ago, see User:CategorizationBot. Multichill (talk) 20:34, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you for your quick response, and for pointing me in the right direction. I’ll ask there… Anders (talk) 20:44, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Anders: I ran that bot and stop doing so 8 years ago. So no point in asking there. You could give Commons:Bots/Work requests a try, but I doubt anyone will pick it up. Multichill (talk) 20:51, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
File:Bromadoline.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 18:53, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Structured data for new Wikidata entries[edit]

Hi Multichill,

I've created a Wikidata entry for the Ricoh GR III camera ([1]), and added the missing 'Exif make' statement to the Sigma DP2 Merrill entry ([2]), in hopes that the BotMultichillT would pick them up and add the respective 'capture with' property to photographs taken with these cameras (e.g., [3], [4]). Is it a matter of time before that happens, or do I need to do something else? Many thanks, Julesvernex2 (talk) 09:22, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Date in bot...[edit]

Hi, sorry, I don't speak English, Nederlands (but I really like listening Shocking Blue - Mariska Veres! Margriet Esruijs or the sisters of the Pussycat...), français or Deutsche... (mein Großvater wäre traurig!)

So... Your bot use here the date of 1969-12-31... My birthday is 1966-12-31; Does this date have any connection with my birth date?

I would appreciate it if you could answer us, and I apologize for the inconvenience caused and for my bad English. André Koehne TALK TO ME 02:15, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The bot takes the date from your upload. I have no idea why your upload via Commons:Mobile app used that date. I changed both to 11. September 2023, 17:46. HenkvD (talk)
I guess it's a bug in the Commons:Mobile app related to the Unix epoch. --bdijkstra (overleg) 08:29, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Upload bot - source codes?[edit]

Hi multichill, please, is the source code of your GeographBot available somewhere? I would to take some inspiration how the upload,processing and categories are done. Thanks, Zbytovsky (talk) 16:22, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Zbytovsky: https://github.com/multichill/toollabs/blob/master/bot/commons/geograph_uploader.py . Multichill (talk) 16:38, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks! Good code, it answered all my questions. :-) Also, please don't you know where is the correct place to test my bot? It seems test.wikipedia.org doesn't support uploads. Zbytovsky (talk) 19:34, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Own work in bot uploads?[edit]

In the by your bot uploaded files in this category such as this painting have an own license but as a source the museum is given. Do you work for the museum or...is it a mistake? I was to update/harmonize the licenses of the category, so I ask.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 18:05, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Paradise Chronicle: where on File:Adolph Tidemand - The Farm Gulsvik in Hallingdal - NG.M.00302-066 - National Museum of Art, Architecture and Design.jpg does it say it's own work? Multichill (talk) 18:09, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ou, blimey, it's the license I release my own files usually,ː). Sorry, all good and nothing to worry for us here then. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 18:31, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Paradise Chronicle: {{Licensed-PD-Art}} is just {{PD-Art}} with a fallback license. I use it when the source provides one. Looks like the layout is slightly different. That should probably be corrected. Multichill (talk) 18:50, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
File:ACDC Lane Street art poster.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 09:51, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:PointofViewSculpturePittsburgh.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DanielPenfield (talk) 22:10, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Source category[edit]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category_talk:Images_from_the_Nationalmuseum_Stockholm/Views&diff=prev&oldid=798104164

your bot added the template to these talk pages. i guess that might be an error? RZuo (talk) 19:32, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:GZalm.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dajasj (talk) 09:24, 4 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:US Navy 030129-N-8935H-006 rigging a casualty power cable.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

1.145.214.156 13:24, 4 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:1-F-LY341495-prodrug structure.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Alfa-ketosav (talk) 17:20, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Nicolas Poussin - The Mystic Marriage of Saint Catherine - NG 2319 - National Galleries of Scotland.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 15:11, 26 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:PortobelloHarbourMap.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FropFrop (talk) 07:33, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Wik s100.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: not CCBY or is it?!
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Prototyperspective (talk) 11:11, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 11:24, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:STEEN 30 5 X 15 X 8 5 CM F 153-22 PMVD - Unknown - 20484669 - RCE.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JopkeB (talk) 14:31, 6 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks Multichill :)[edit]

Hi Multichill User29370 (talk) 03:17, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

He/She didn't reply. Perhaps the user is inactive. Please come back later. SiCebuTransmissionCorrecter (talk) 15:06, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dit orgel is wat ik altijd meegekregen heb wel een van de beste ut Fryslan.En wordt praktisch elke zondag door Boukje Bosch van de haadwei ut Damwald bespeeld soms is het zo goed wat zij er mee doet dan krijg je soms de tranen in de ogen .Wat een geweldige combinatie is dat zondags .En ik daar nu ca 55 jaar na de kerk en soms hoor je er iets uit wat nooit eerder gehoord is .Die Baukje is een ster op haar vakgebied. Ga zo door Baukje! Jij verdiend de hoofdprijs .groet, Liekele 2A02:A467:B2BE:1:653A:4174:511D:C81E 20:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

foto's E.H. Stuut zo rond 1929[edit]

Hallo. klopt het inderdaad dat u foto's hebt geuploaded die gemaakt zijn door E.H. Stuut? Het Tropenmuseum, het Wereldmuseum Amsterdam heeft die foto's in haar bezit gekregen door een schenking van een ir. G.A. Mol. Ik vraag me af waar die foto's oorspronkelijk vandaan komen en of ze inderdaad gemaakt zijn door mijn grootvader. Op Wikimedia Commons staan nl. zijn voorletters erbij maar op de foto's in het museum niet. hopelijk kunt u mij verder helpen Biakkarinbaria (talk) 21:57, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Getty open content uploads?[edit]

I see in this discussion - [5] that you operated a bot to upload images from Getty's Open Content Program [6]. However, it doesn't look like anyone has done any bulk upload of images from Getty after that discussion. I'm at the moment improving some articles on decorative art and would like to use some of their images that are marked as CC0, for example, this one - [7]. I will probably upload them individually, but it would be useful have grab data automatically from those files. Is this something you will be interested in doing? Hzh (talk) 12:25, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Lottedepart06.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:53, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Help upload more Geographicus maps[edit]

Hi, I saw lots of your works on geographicus maps, but I wonder, how do you upload those maps in such a good scale with nice rendering? maybe you can help me to upload more geographicus maps, this 1943 Japanese wartime map of Sumatra haven't been placed on commons, but I wish someone could place it because I have no idea how to do it, I hope you could help me Mhatopzz (talk) 13:13, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:6797 Emigrant Gap Feb 87cr - Flickr - drewj1946.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

14.200.225.254 04:56, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:SP 6820 WB Mogul March 90smcr - Flickr - drewj1946.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

14.200.225.254 04:57, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Artworks with Wikidata item: quick statements[edit]

I am looking at catching up with 13k files backlog at Category:Artworks with Wikidata item: quick statements and thinking about how avoid adding bad data to Wikidata. I guess some cases is due clearly wrong data on Commons, like wrong title from File:Jacopo da Ponte-Adoration des bergers.jpg getting copied to d:Q107329200. Thanks for undoing my edit, but the bad data was still in File:Jacopo da Ponte-Adoration des bergers.jpg and the file was automatically placed in Category:Artworks with Wikidata item: quick statements, ready to be copied again ( I fixed it now). Another source of bad metadata transfer from Commons to Wikidata was due to Artworks being connected to items for people or wrong artworks. I can block metadata transfers from lets say paintings to items for people, but files connected to wrong paintings are harder to noticed. Do you have any thoughts on ways of most safe metadata transfers? Jarekt (talk) 23:11, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]