User talk:Multichill/Archives/2014/June
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Potentially problematic Geographicus image
Hi Multichill! I stumbled across the fantastic Geographicus maps that you uploaded - amazing collaboration and collection, and it's wonderful we can have them here. There's a potential issue with File:1775_Scrimshaw_Map_of_Boston_Carved_on_Revolutionary_War_Powder_Horn_-_Geographicus_-_BostonPowderHorn-1775.jpg, and I was hoping you might have a contact at Geographicus that could help out. The problem is that reproductions of 3D public domain works are not public domain. Would there be any way of getting Geographicus to release their rights to it? I know that it was probably implied by them giving you the image, but it would probably be better if we could get it explicitly, since the {{PD-Art}} tag is not really applicable in this instance. If you're too busy, I'd be willing to try to contact them for it if you have an idea of who I should contact. Best regards, Storkk (talk) 14:26, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
No consensus
Hello Multichill, what is for you consensus? I really think you could have some personal against me. 2:10 is no consensus!? The second people was direct asked from the other one, which give than completely wrong argumentation. Sorry but I see only technologie knowledge by you. → Perhelion 14:44, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Going ad hominem? Get lost. Multichill (talk) 15:31, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Ok I'm sorry I tend a bit to exaggerating (your steadily questionable statements have me do it). So you can please objectively answer the question? → Perhelion 15:42, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- It is not an ad hominem, it's not the first time you not answer. Sorry I really try not to take it personally. Maybe you have a good reputation, but you can not handle so with admin decisions. Anyway good bye → Perhelion 21:09, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Raak.GIF
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Raak.GIF, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:07, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
File:1937 National Geographic Map of the White Mountains - Geographicus - WhiteMountains-nationalgeographic-1937.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Storkk (talk) 15:38, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
File:1935 Reid Pictorial Map of Edinburgh and Leith, Scotland - Geographicus - Edinburgh-reid-1935.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Storkk (talk) 15:47, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Heritage at labs
Hi. I was wondering if you could add me to the Heritage tool on labs. That way I can keep maintaining the Swedish lists/SQL set-ups. Cheers /Lokal_Profil 13:58, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
- Done. I added you to the group. Some notes:
- Please update the log when you change something. You can do this by typing "!log local-heritage <your message>" in #wikimedia-labs on Freenode
- All code is in git / gerrit. Use it and don't leave code uncommitted
- Have fun! Multichill (talk) 11:32, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks. /Lokal_Profil 08:53, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Starr 030419-0063 Leptecophylla tameiameiae.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Thiotrix (talk) 11:51, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Basvb (talk) 13:56, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
RCE subset voor verwijdering
Hallo Multichill,
zoals bekend heeft de RCE om verwijdering van een subset van de afbeeldingen gevraagd, ik heb deze genomineerd, bij deze de formele inlichting daarvan.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Basvb (talk • contribs) 14:56, 27 June 2014 (UTC)