User talk:Multichill/Archives/2017/January

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Little misunderstanding.

I totally agree to go on the "Art Photo" model, but not "Art Work". --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:24, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Great, good to hear that. Multichill (talk) 14:28, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
Can you make a bot for this? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:54, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
Sorry Archaeodontosaurus, missed your reply. {{Artwork}} has {{Artwork/subst}} to easily change from {{Information}}. {{Art Photo}} doesn't have {{Art Photo/subst}}, but that shouldn't be too hard to create.
I'll have a shot at it. Can you test with a couple of your uploads when it's done? Multichill (talk) 15:56, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Yes of course with pleasure --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
@Archaeodontosaurus: I created {{Art Photo/subst}}. You can test it by replacing "{{Information" with "{{subst:Art Photo/subst|subst=subst:"
This is a general template that might not completely fit what you like. Maybe make a custom one for you, tweak it and have a bot go over your past uploads to replace it?
Do you have an example of a file that is using {{Information}} and is formatted in a way you formatted most of your past uploads and do you have an example of a file that uses {{Art photo}} in a way you're happy about it? I'll just make a custom mapping template based on that. Multichill (talk) 16:22, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
I made User:Archaeodontosaurus/Art photo and switched File:Frari (Venice) nave left - St.Peter Chapel - The last Judgement by Andrea Vicentino.jpg. Multichill (talk) 16:43, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Accademia - Giambattista Tiepolo, San Domenico in gloria 1723.jpg Seems to be a good example. Between initial version ( 22 novembre 2016 à 11:00‎ ) am and the current version. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:42, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:47, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Geschilderd portret van Mevrouw van Heek - Rutbeek - 20193916 - RCE.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Ronn (talk) 15:49, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 17:22, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

This was not supposed to be included in the nomination request. I have withdrawn my nomination for this image. Elisfkc (talk) 17:25, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
I was about to do a Turing test on you. Multichill (talk) 17:26, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
File:AzadArslan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kaulder (contribs | talk) 07:52, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi Multichill. Could you please have a look at the four files you put into Category:Pages using Information template with incorrect parameter? --Leyo 22:55, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

What files are you talking about? Multichill (talk) 21:16, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
They have all been fixed in the meantime. One of them was this. --Leyo 21:43, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
File:Alcyon Poster 1914.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 21:03, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

File:WLANL - jpa2003 - Heilige Hieronymus (Antoon van Dijk).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vincent Steenberg (talk) 10:26, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

File:WLANL - mchangsp - 090626-122734 1784 50D.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tekstman (talk) 17:25, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

File:WLANL - mchangsp - 090626-122903 1792 50D.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tekstman (talk) 17:25, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

File:WLANL - mchangsp - Aankomst in de gevangenis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tekstman (talk) 17:25, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

File:WLANL - mchangsp - Een burger kijkt met weemoed terug op sijn SS-verleden.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tekstman (talk) 17:26, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

File:WLANL - mchangsp - Een verrassing.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tekstman (talk) 17:26, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

File:WLANL - mchangsp - Historicus Lou de Jong graaft naar het verleden.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tekstman (talk) 17:26, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

File:WLANL - mchangsp - Hitler karikaturen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tekstman (talk) 17:26, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

File:SGP-jongeren.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 15:23, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Sambal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

108.175.11.225 18:12, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Naming image files of paintings

What good custom when naming images of paintings? 1) Should the file's title be the same as the painting, may with the year or artist in brackets if there other files with the same name?

here is an example File:Seapiece by Moonlight.jpg

2) Should the file's title be with as much information as possible?

here is an example File:Caspar David Friedrich, Efter stormen, 1817, KMS8817.jpg

I think #1 is best. #2 is too much, the information is available template.workart and in wikidata.

--Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 20:31, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

When I upload paintings I usually use something like "<artist> - <title> - <collection> - <inventory number>.<extension>", for example File:Fra Bartolommeo - Holy Family - LACMA - M.73.83.tif or File:Hendrick ter Brugghen - Bacchante with an Ape - 84.PA.5 - J. Paul Getty Museum.jpg. Artist and title are quite nice essential information to have in a title. Inventory number and collection make it more complete and more important: Make the filename unique so you don't run into any name collision problems while uploading a (big) collection. My preference is File:Caspar David Friedrich, Efter stormen, 1817, KMS8817.jpg. Not too long, a nice descriptive filename.
@MSanderhoff: nice to see SMK uploads! I wrote a bot some time ago to add the SMK works to Wikidata. Could probably use that to upload the missing public domain images to Commons.
I picked a random painting d:Q20268245. That one links to http://www.smk.dk/en/explore-the-art/search-smk/#/detail/KMSst210 , but you also have http://collection.smk.dk/#/en/detail/KMSst210 . Is that the new collection site? Looks good! Multichill (talk) 20:56, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
The collection.smk.dk is a new site, yes. AFAIU on MSanderhoff this is the prefered? — Fnielsen (talk) 18:08, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks @Villy Fink Isaksen: @Multichill: @Fnielsen: for your comments and input! As an art historian, I like the greater precision of having the basic tombstone data of an artwork in the file name, that's why I named the image file like that. Glad you enjoy the SMK online collection - working on getting more on Wikimedia Commons in the next few years as we release more of it in hires for free download on the museum's new website. For now, the prefered access point is collection.smk.dk which draws directly on our database MSanderhoff (talk) 11:06, 30 January 2017 (UTC)