User talk:Multichill/Archives/2021/September

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Kapconstructie en houten rookkanaal - Hemert - 20453121 - RCE.jpg

File:Kapconstructie en houten rookkanaal - Hemert - 20453121 - RCE.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

41.115.72.135 10:15, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

File:US Navy 060201-N-5832A-004 An aircraft handler gets an F-14D Tomcat assigned to the Black Lions of Fighter Squadron two One three (VF-213) into position for launch.jpg

File:US Navy 060201-N-5832A-004 An aircraft handler gets an F-14D Tomcat assigned to the Black Lions of Fighter Squadron two One three (VF-213) into position for launch.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Contributers2020Talk to me here 11:12, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Afifa Afrin (talk) 15:52, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Op deze manier blijft er weinig over

Multichill, er werd een foto verwijderd op een pagina van mijn volglijst. Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Istiqlal Mosque Hierbij is nu hier ook de begeleidende tekst van bij de foto's verdwenen. Jammer. Het ging om de foto COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM De Istiqlal moskee en de kathedraal TMnr 20018358.jpg. Dus met de moskee (een lelijk blok, naar mijn mening) ging ook de omgeving van de moskee verloren zoals de kathedraal. Is het niet mogelijk om de moskee afte blokken met grijs? Of de contouren volgooien met een emmertje grijs? Lidewij (talk) 12:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Lidewij een beetje gefrustreerde gebruiker over het feit dat er zoveel foto's zijn verwijderd? Ik heb een reactie achtergelaten. Multichill (talk) 20:02, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

"Citation needed"

Is this edit, where you added a "citation needed" to another user's comment, the best way for an administrator to act? I am unaware of any Wikimedia Commons policy on this, but common decency and w:Wikipedia:TPO suggest that this is not the most productive way to contribute to a discussion.  Mysterymanblue  19:00, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

That's not a user comment, that's an picture with a nonsense description. If it would have been a user comment, it would have been signed with ~~~~ so it would be clear who is stating this opinion. Multichill (talk) 19:08, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Obviously we disagree, but I think it's pretty clear from the position of the image and the context in prose that the image is a part of a specific user comment.  Mysterymanblue  19:16, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
It isn't clear to me who added the picture. Multichill (talk) 19:55, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Fair enough. I have attributed the image caption to the user who added the image and have removed the "citation needed".  Mysterymanblue  20:07, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Multichill/Archives/2021/September&oldid=630127903"