User talk:Multichill/Archives/2008/January
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This image has nothing to do with a diagram. Please don't categorize images like this as Botanical diagrams. Thanks. ----Ies 17:38, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
- Dear Les, look at the page. It got a template saying: "This image was moved to Wikimedia Commons from nl.wikipedia using a bot script. All source information is still present. It requires review because CommonSense could not categorise the image during transfer. Once the review has been completed, this template should be removed. For details, see below." The categories are added by a bot and still have to be checked by a human. And please stop flooding my talk page. Multichill 17:43, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, i almost forgot: Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel a media or gallery needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikimedia Commons is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any media and gallery by simply following the Edit link at the top. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. Multichill 17:45, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
- Dear Multichill, flooding is a well suiting catchwort for the current situation. Please stop flooding Botanical diagrams and other categories with images that do not belong there! I already recategorized about hundred images that have been wrong categorized by your bot and am feeling very annoyed by that not ending flood. Either teach your bot a much better categorizing or stop it. This flood of wrong categorizing is not acceptable! --Ies 17:57, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
- In short, what you are saying is "I know I made a mess and I'm inviting people to improve that". Wouldn't it be a better way of working to not make a mess in the first place? If your bot is not able to do a decent job on categorizing, then don't let it categorize at all. - Andre Engels 12:49, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- Lots of pictures end up in the right categories some dont. Some cats is better than no cats at all. Multichill 13:42, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Teramo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Franco 14:13, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
OK, sorry. Franco 17:37, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
- OK sorry, I had a long backlog images need tagging. Sorry if this tag was wrong. You may write an English description.--OsamaK 17:51, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
An APC for the bot
I was attempting to categorize some images yesterday when I encountered one of those problematic images that can come from nl.wikipedia where its meaning, use and reason for uploading are very very very unclear.
I made what I consider to be an 'all purpose category' for these images; its creation gave me a great peaceful feeling and perhaps might make operating that bot of yours easier as well. This category is Category:Philosophy of the Netherlands. -- carol 06:07, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Aalto vaas 1937.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--User:G.dallorto 11:19, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:KoninginBorculo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 07:40, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Aalto vaas 1937.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 12:47, 15 January 2008 (UTC)