User talk:Multichill/Archives/2015/June

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The RCE broke their image database

De RCE heeft een nieuwe beeldbank. Alle links van Commons naar de beeldbank doen het nu niet meer. Kun je hen vragen of ze een redirect systeem maken waardoor de links weer werken? In de nieuwe beeldbank zijn de URL's niet te herleiden tot de identifier die eerder in de url werd gebruikt (Adlib priref). Nu zien direct links er zo uit:

http://beeldbank.cultureelerfgoed.nl/alle-afbeeldingen/detail/c445b004-eb10-672e-b6ed-b6421f4af7f2/media/d76a536c-8d8b-e028-6abc-4217e3bd91ed

--Vera (talk) 09:36, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Handig dat ze dat veranderd hebben. Die URL's zitten denk ik wel in de data (de daadwerkelijke adressen van de foto's zagen er ook zo uit). Ik zal eens een mailtje sturen met het feit dat we nu 450.000 404 error links hebben. Mvg, Basvb (talk) 01:02, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Oke heb gemaild met de vraag of we dit handig kunnen oplossen. Als minder handige oplossing zouden we naar links als http://beeldbank.cultureelerfgoed.nl/alle-afbeeldingen/?q=20369797 kunnen linken. Mvg, Basvb (talk) 01:09, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Ze gaan de redirects aanmaken (twitterberichtje). Wel is de suggestie om toch naar de UUID's te verwijzen (neem aan dat dat de nieuwe links zijn), daarnaast werd voorgesteld om de gegevens bij afbeeldingen een keer te actualiseren (weet niet hoe makkelijk dat zal gaan). Zelf denk ik erover nog eens te kijken om weer eens een setje naar hier te halen, bouwtekeningen zijn de grootste set die we nog niet hebben. Mvg, Basvb (talk) 14:21, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

ErfgoedBot may be affected by a change in MediaWiki API

Hi Multichill,

I contact you because you run a bot (ErfgoedBot) on the French Wikipedia and according to this announcement, it may break by the end of June because of the change of the default continuation mode in MediaWiki API.

Please check if your code or your library needs to be updated before it happens.

Thanks,

Orlodrim (talk) 09:37, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

@Orlodrim: thanks for the notification. I'm aware two bots running old code. I'll either update it or shut it down. Multichill (talk) 16:31, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

no claim pages

Can u tell me what a claim on wp means? Cause I just know claims from law and from gold diggers.--Sanandros (talk) 17:10, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

@Sanandros: with no claim I mean no Wikidata claim. I wrote a bit of documentation at d:User:Multichill/No claim. Multichill (talk) 16:29, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Category:Cultural_heritage_monuments_in_the_Philippines_uploaded_by_Ramon_FVelasquez_to_sort_out

Category discussion warning

Category:Cultural_heritage_monuments_in_the_Philippines_uploaded_by_Ramon_FVelasquez_to_sort_out has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:48, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:46, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Comma category, possibly added by some of your userspace templates

Hi, Multichill. I noticed this oddly-named redlinked category, Category:, (the name is a comma). It seems to be coming from one of the templates in your userspace, possibly User:Multichill/HABS or one of the ones it calls. I have the following questions:

  • Is this a valid category? If so, would you mind explaining what it is for?
  • If not a valid category, would you please look at your template(s) and see if you can fix it/them?

I also sort of think that templates in userspace shouldn't be used outside of userspace this way. I'm not saying you are the one who used it/them, but could we find a templatespace template to use instead? Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 06:55, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Walt Disney Studios Park.jpeg

File:Walt Disney Studios Park.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Disneyland Paris FoP concerns...

Moved to a subpage - Commons:Deletion_requests/2015/06/24/Disneyland_Paris_FOP

I have no objections to other DR's being merged there.

I also collapased the notifcations on the User Talk page you raised concerns about. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:56, 25 June 2015 (UTC) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:56, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Rodent identification

Hi, File:Lunchtime at Waters' Edge Park - geograph.org.uk - 326765.jpg is obviously not a vole belonging to Arvicola species, probably a kind of rat (see eyes, ears, nose and the tail diameter). I have moved it to Category:Unidentified Rodentia as a precaution. --Salix (talk) 16:49, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Civic Sedan 1988-1991.jpg

File:Civic Sedan 1988-1991.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

OSX (talk • contributions) 06:17, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Multichill/Archives/2015/June&oldid=180161054"