User talk:Multichill/Archives/2016/April
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
File:Tec7.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Smooth_O (talk) 07:55, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
File:Tec4.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Smooth_O (talk) 07:56, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
File:Tec3.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Smooth_O (talk) 07:56, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
File:Tec3-4-7.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Smooth_O (talk) 07:57, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
RCE template and images that can't be removed from a category
Hi there Multichill,
I'm having a problem removing images (such as this one) that are now in Category:Temples due to a new (?) RCE template given to these images. I saw that you had started Category:Images from RCE by subject so I was hoping you'd know more about this whole issue than I do. I think the problem lies in the template {{RCE-subject|Tempel}}. I tried to fix it but I can't even seem to be able to get anywhere. Could you please have a look? Bij voorbaat dank, - Takeaway (talk) 18:36, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- Nu is er weer een nieuw probleem erbij gekomen, namelijk {{RCE-subject|Panorama}}. Alle bestanden die ermee voorzien zijn, staan nu in Category:Panoramics. Ik ben bang dat als ik aan het wijzigen ga, er iets fouts zal gaan. Ik heb namelijk geen ervaring met templates. Kunt u hier misschien ook naar kijken? Het zelfde probleem komt ook voor bij Category:Restaurants, waarbij de bestanden voorzien zijn van {{RCE-subject|Restaurants}}. Met vriendelijke groet, - Takeaway (talk) 20:44, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- Hi, this edit is likely the cause. Previously these files could be found in temporary categories such as: Category:RCE suggested: Restaurant, see the mother category. The idea was to manually translate these and replace them by correct categories if relevant. Also all files are from the Netherlands, so putting the in Restaurants in the Netherlands would've been the idea. I don't know whether adding them now directly into categories using mostly dutch tags is a good idea. Recently I've thought about just removing the RCE-suggested template from all files which are left. But more to the point: feel free to replace/remove the template with categories, using a new line in the Template could do this automatically (is the bot still running Multichill?). Basvb (talk) 09:22, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Ok I decided to revert the given edit and open a discussion at the template talk page. The edit simply has a bit too high impact with negative effects of poluting non-relevant categories and producing non created Dutch categories with lots of files. Basvb (talk) 09:27, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for looking into this Basvb. - Takeaway (talk) 13:10, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Ok I decided to revert the given edit and open a discussion at the template talk page. The edit simply has a bit too high impact with negative effects of poluting non-relevant categories and producing non created Dutch categories with lots of files. Basvb (talk) 09:27, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Hi, this edit is likely the cause. Previously these files could be found in temporary categories such as: Category:RCE suggested: Restaurant, see the mother category. The idea was to manually translate these and replace them by correct categories if relevant. Also all files are from the Netherlands, so putting the in Restaurants in the Netherlands would've been the idea. I don't know whether adding them now directly into categories using mostly dutch tags is a good idea. Recently I've thought about just removing the RCE-suggested template from all files which are left. But more to the point: feel free to replace/remove the template with categories, using a new line in the Template could do this automatically (is the bot still running Multichill?). Basvb (talk) 09:22, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
File:Waterfall1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Stefan2 (talk) 15:07, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
RCE permalink not working, again
Looks like they updated their image viewer, and now the permalinks don't work anymore. --Vera (talk) 12:22, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- They changed their primary entry from the adlib priref to another (much longer) image number some time ago. I remember that I've had contact about this and they asked us whether we would be able to change to this number. Maybe they've now decided to turn the redirects off completely. Changing the numbers to the image number is quite difficult as these are nowhere to be found on our image pages and would require running over all of the images and requesting this number from their API and then changing it on the image page. I think I'll send them an email to ask whether my suspicions on this are correct. Basvb (talk) 14:22, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- The relevant tweet at that time was: ([1]) the new numbers are called UUID’s. Basvb (talk) 14:24, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- Ok, looks like User:Oursana has fixed the link and that the whole identifier issue was not (yet?) the problem but simply the base link. Should work fine after all files get purged/updated. Basvb (talk) 15:38, 14 April 2016 (UTC)