User talk:Multichill/Archives/2013/July

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Autotranslate reloaded

I just want to let you know that I've compiled a LUA function that allows named parameters. It is being used by Template:Autolang. The result can be inspected in the sandbox. Performance data for the example given:

<!-- 
NewPP limit report
Preprocessor visited node count: 743/1000000
Preprocessor generated node count: 8052/1500000
Post‐expand include size: 33710/2048000 bytes
Template argument size: 3776/2048000 bytes
Highest expansion depth: 18/40
Expensive parser function count: 5/500
Lua time usage: 0.199s
Lua memory usage: 472 KB
-->

Dependent on the user's chosen language and the existence of a translation, up to 6 expensive parser function will be invoked. LUA memory is not an issue and the Lua time usage maximum set in the server config is 7s. I guess it could be optimized in this regard when transferring the fallback logic to the LUA module itself.

Please let me know whether you think it would be appropriate to advertise this more broadly or whether you see issues here and whether it's worth putting more efforts into it. -- Rillke(q?) 12:46, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Heleen Mees.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:05, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Copyvio

I just got an email from Gerard Til that it was never authorized by him to be uploaded here. She is in the news now so I feel we should delete the image as quickly as possible in case there are legal issues if someone starts printing posters with it.--Canoe1967 (talk) 17:24, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

[removing automatic copyvio note, as the file was uploaded via BotMultichillT] Btw, part of your list at en:User:Multichill/top self uploaders/Kevorkmail... Gunnex (talk) 16:31, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi Multichill! Sorry for spamming your user talkpage. I am preparing a mass deletion request envolving some files of this user transferred by your bot (and other users) to Commons. It would be nice if you would keep alive this section and the transfer list en:User:Multichill/top self uploaders/Kevorkmail (especially this historic version is of interest) because they will serve as a reference for the DR and for further research. Thanks. Gunnex (talk) 20:04, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
File:Trans-buteendizuur.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 02:50, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Alaverdi mountains.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Southgeist (talk) 16:20, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

File:FL LATA.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Southgeist (talk) 19:33, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Request for confirmation about free use of an image (print)

Dear Multichill,

I'm an author/scholar (and wiki user, occasionally contributing/editing) who came across this image you uploaded:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Perpetua.jpg

I would like to see if I can use this in a printed publication (I am not sure if it's high-res enough, but that's the publisher's issue to determine) but want to be sure I am not infringing any rights. I have looked at the licensing information and it seems to be OK - I am just trying to be very scrupulous!

I haven't found any standard way to give credit for such material and would be happy to personalize it more than "Wikimedia Commons" if possible/appropriate.

I'll try to check "talk" but my email is andrewbmcgowan@gmail.com

Thanks and best wishes,

A. McG.

I think Multichill is on a break. The image is public domain as a copy of a work created circa 1280. You actually don't need anyone's permission to print it. Your readers may wish their own copy if you would like to mention our version. I also uploaded a larger image. The larger one may not be better if it is a poor scaling of the smaller one.--Canoe1967 (talk) 08:16, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Geographicus texts

Hi, I noticed that you uploaded (some two years ago) the files from Geographicus, with their permission. What is unclear to me is whether we also had the permission to upload the accompanying texts (which were in itself, unlike the maps, not public domain). A text like the one on File:1720 De La Feuille Map and View of Gibraltar - Geographicus - Gibraltar-lafeuille-1720.jpg would not be acceptable unless it was specifically released by the copyright owner. This may have ben a part of the "deal" with Geographicus, but this isn't stated anywhere.

Commons:Geographicus indicates that the collection of digital images was given; Commons:Batch uploading/Geographicus states "The owner was perfectly happy with me using dezoomify to get the high resolution images."

Can you confirm that the texts were part of the deal? Fram (talk) 07:46, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

File:WLANL - Urville Djasim - Zelfportret - Fabritius.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Oursana (talk) 11:49, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

File:WLANL - kwispeltail - Fabritius.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Oursana (talk) 11:54, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

File:WLANL - Artshooter - Zelfportret.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Oursana (talk) 12:10, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

File:WLANL - jpa2003 - Zelfportret (Fabritius).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Oursana (talk) 12:16, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

File:WLANL - Quistnix! - Museum Boijmans van Beuningen - Zelfportret, Fabritius.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Oursana (talk) 12:27, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

alerte fichier sans categorie

bonjour,

Je viens de me rendre compte que "CategorizationBot" ne m'allerte pas quand je telecharge une image avec UploadWizard. est ce normal ? (I have just realized "CategorizationBot" not allerte me when I upload an image with UploadWizard. it is normal?) bye --Chatsam (talk) 12:43, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

File:WLANL - Ritanila - IMG 2493 Zelfportret, Fabritius.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Oursana (talk) 15:45, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

File:WLANL - Ritanila - IMG 2493 Zelfportret, Fabritius.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Oursana (talk) 15:49, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Waterfrntparkpllou.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Poupou l'quourouce (talk) 18:41, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Secondstredev.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Poupou l'quourouce (talk) 20:54, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Tropenmuseum question

Hi Multichill, if I'm not mistaken you handled at least part of the negotiations with the Tropenmuseum. Would it be possible to ask them to donate some portraits of njais (the native Indonesian mistresses of Dutchmen in the Indies)? We don't seem to have any on Commons, except for a very-low quality scan I found on the web.Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:14, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

I noticed your revert. KIT and Tropenmuseum is the same collection. Multichill (talk) 14:15, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Notification

Hello, there is a de-flag proposal at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag which affects your bot. Regards --Steinsplitter (talk) 22:37, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Boudewijngebouw.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BrightRaven (talk) 09:11, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

South Tyrol

Hey Multichill, I left a question on your bot's talk page some time ago, but I see that you are enjoying a break, that's why I wanted to bring this to your attention. --Mai-Sachme (talk) 13:08, 30 July 2013 (UTC)