User talk:Multichill/Archives/2013/October

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Thanks

Thanks for finding problems and ensuring our safety. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 11:26, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Typologie.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

KDS4444 (talk) 15:55, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Removed category

Hi Multichill. I think, your bot should not remove a category tag when updating any tracking page as here. Thank you. --ŠJů (talk) 16:55, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Look at the first line, use the header. Multichill (talk) 21:33, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
I'm sorry! My mistake. --ŠJů (talk) 11:28, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
No mistake, just hidden in plain sight :-)
I see you found it. The other reporting pages also support header pages in case you want to add an intro there too. Multichill (talk) 18:17, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Edgecappedoctahedralcluster.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 16:08, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Sorting of Missing commons category links

I have a little proposal. Shouldn't be the cs:Wikipedie:WikiProjekt Wiki Loves Monuments/Missing commons category links list grouped rather by source list and sorted alphabetically by the name of the source page or by iso of the region/district rather than by ID? --ŠJů (talk) 11:28, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

I was thinking about that too, but that would mean that the bot needs to be rewritten. You should probably file a bug for that so we don't forget about it. Multichill (talk) 18:17, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Bug 55643. --ŠJů (talk) 23:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Om nom nom! Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 12:39, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 21:04, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Bot errors in January

Hi Multichill. Would you be willing to fix the errors of your bot from January? See COM:BWR#Possible Rijksmonument. --Leyo 20:57, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Excuse me? The topic you linked only contains links to one user making a mess. Why are you accusing my bot of making errors? Multichill (talk) 17:51, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Starr 010515-0124 Pinus pinaster.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Quaah3 (talk) 09:22, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Coordinates for South Tyrolean monuments

Hey Multichill, could you please fire up a manual bot run? There should be a pretty number of pictures showing South Tyrolean monuments from WLM2013 still without coordinates. --Mai-Sachme (talk) 11:43, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi Multichill. I left a small question in the site above about the article count, if you have time, please check it out :)--3BRBS (talk) 18:30, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Scoop mrt2006.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ErikvanB (talk) 13:07, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

File:US Navy 090813-N-5207L-087 Information Systems Technician 1st Class James Paisley assigned to Command Logistics Group Western Pacific, works with Republic of Singapore Navy Capt. K.C. Teo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Spawnwitch (talk) 11:46, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Jan Akkerman

Beste Multichill, ik hoop dat jij me kunt helpen. Gisteren heb ik geprobeerd om een foto die ik in 2008 van Jan Akkerman heb gemaakt te laten verwijderen op zijn verzoek omdat er betere foto's van hem op Wikimedia Commons staan, maar dat is me niet gelukt. Mijn eigen schuld omdat ik bij een vorige verwijdersessie nogal geprotesteerd heb. Maar nu ik hem zelf gesproken heb zou ik toch wel graag deze foto verwijderen, ik heb alle pagina's waarop de foto stond al aangepast, dus hij is op geen enkele pagina meer in gebruik. Met vriendelijke groet, Ilonamay (talk) 11:07, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Op Commons gooien we geen foto's weg omdat er een betere foto beschikbaar is. Waarom wil je het verwijderen? Wat zouden we daarmee opschieten? Het is niet dat we er schijfruimte mee besparen. De foto is vrijgegeven onder een vrije licentie dus als mensen deze foto willen gebruiken dan kan dat gewoon. Multichill (talk) 13:34, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Re: Wiki Loves Monuments 2013

Replied at User talk:Brainmachine. Please don't hop talk pages. Multichill (talk) 16:15, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Flickr - NewsPhoto! - Uit de oude doos (4).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lymantria (talk) 08:11, 30 October 2013 (UTC)