User talk:Multichill/Archives/2022/April
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Geograph uploads, descriptions, structured data and "mills"
First of all, thank you for uploading files from geograph.or.uk with your bot. There are a few issues, however. For one, I wish you'd include the descriptions of the files, as these often contain valuable information that helps with finer categorisation. Another are the keywords ("Depicts") in the structured data that are added to the files, or rather one of these words. It seems that whenever the word "mill" appears in the file name, the keyword "molinology" appears in the data, and in many cases this is just plain odd and often wrong - it is well known that in England "mill" is frequently used as a synonym for "factory", probably because early factories were powered by water wheels, but most of them aren't mills in the proper sense. I am not sure how this fluidity in terms should be addressed, but at any rate, it should. --Schlosser67 (talk) 07:46, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Description often contains too much irrelevant text. I had a look at it several times and always concluded that it shouldn't be included on Commons.
- Mapping of tags to items is done at User:GeographBot/Tags. Looking at current usage it seems to be a mix of windmill (Q38720), watermill (Q185187) & factory (Q83405) (aka mill) which are all subclass of industrial building (Q12144897) so I changed the mapping to that. Multichill (talk) 21:10, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- Concerning mills: Thank you, this is probably the best that can be done at the moment, considering that the geograph tags aren't well defined, either. Concerning the descriptions, I don't quite agree. There are many that are fairly irrelevant and/or wordy, so much is true, but there are more that actually add information which helps to locate and interpret the image, in particular when the image title is very generic (such as "Ordnance Survey Cut Mark" or "M6 motorway"). I have usually found the useful bit of information at the beginning of the descriptions. Maybe limit the number of characters? --Schlosser67 (talk) 11:56, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Category:Media_needing_categories_to_be_checked_by_a_bot has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
A1Cafel (talk) 10:10, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/beeld* heilig landstichting
Copyright violation. These sculptures are in an open air museum in the Netherlands, so no "public place" because there is no free admission, and therefor FOP is not applicable. And there are no VRT tickets. The photos by RCE are only licensed for the photos, not for the works of art.
- File:Beeldengroep op de binnenplaats van het Sanhedrin - Heilig Land-stichting - 20531458 - RCE.jpg
- File:Beeldengroep op de binnenplaats van het Sanhedrin - Heilig Land-stichting - 20531460 - RCE.jpg
- File:Beeldengroep op de binnenplaats van het Sanhedrin - Heilig Land-stichting - 20531459 - RCE.jpg
- File:In het dorp Nazareth - beeld van een bedelaar - Heilig Land-stichting - 20531371 - RCE.jpg
- File:Beeld van de goede zaaier, bij de begraafplaats - Heilig Land-stichting - 20531483 - RCE.jpg
- File:Detail van de beeldengroep, nabij het dorp Nazareth, voorstellende "herdersveld en wachttoren met loofhut" - Heilig Land-stichting - 20531389 - RCE.jpg
- File:Beeld van een slapende vrouw op een uit kalksteen opgetrokken stoep in het Oosters Straatje - Heilig Land-stichting - 20531444 - RCE.jpg
- File:Overzicht van het Hof van Olijven, met in het midden beeldengroep van drie slapende apostelen - Heilig Land-stichting - 20531519 - RCE.jpg
- File:Beeldengroep van de leden van de Hoge Raad in het grote vertrek van het Sanhedrin - Heilig Land-stichting - 20531461 - RCE.jpg
- File:Beeld van een slapende vrouw op een uit kalksteen opgetrokken stoep in het Oosters Straatje - Heilig Land-stichting - 20531443 - RCE.jpg
- File:Beeld in het dorp Nazareth (Beth Juda)- vrouw met kruik en kind bij de waterbron - Heilig Land-stichting - 20531365 - RCE.jpg
JopkeB (talk) 04:54, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Perl Harbor
Please correct description of the file below: "File:US Navy 040702-N-4304S-136 Warships from several nations sit pierside at Naval Station Pearl Harbor, Hawaii.jpg" from: "Warships from several nations sit pierside at Naval" to eg: "Warships of several nations dock on either side of the Naval" The filename should be corrected as well. Regards Alice — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 37.225.78.239 (talk) 14:23, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- The filename File:US Navy 040702-N-4304S-136 Warships from several nations sit pierside at Naval Station Pearl Harbor, Hawaii.jpg is good enough. We generally keep file names stable.
- Description is from the navy website. Multichill (talk) 14:57, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Technical Barnstar | |
Your bot is fantastic, it saves us so much work. ReneeWrites (talk) 20:34, 24 April 2022 (UTC) |
- @ReneeWrites: thank you! Always nice to see that my work is appreciated. Multichill (talk) 14:55, 30 April 2022 (UTC)