Commons:Deletion requests/File:ACDC Lane Street art poster.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:ACDC Lane Street art poster.JPG[edit]
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 09:51, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
- It's a wheatpaste poster glued to the wall. Sounds pretty permanent to me. You can't really remove it from the wall so for the lifetime of the poster, it will be on this wall. Multichill (talk) 18:04, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- @A1Cafel@Multichill lean towards
Delete for me; I am still not fully-convinced that Australian murals can be freely exploited thru CC-BY/CC-BY-SA/CC-zero/PD-licensed photos without paying artists. See Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Concern on Australian murals. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:47, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Keep As you wrote in that discussion, FOP in Australia "is being criticized by several Australian and aborigine artists as being too open for commercial users to exploit Australian culture and heritage", which implies that right now it's still pretty broad. As such, we don't need to delete until the law is changed/clarified. —holly {chat} 19:08, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Holly Cheng no, street art is not allowed to be commercially photographed in the first place. The interpretation that Australian murals are free to be photographed is from Australian Wikimedians' own interpretation of the court ruling, which does not involve a mural but a yacht. Also, Ms. Pila's commentary on the ruling does not concern free use of Australian murals. See also more recent comments at Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Australia#Please comment: proposal to delete text under FOP heading.
- The controversy on Australian FoP concerns sculptures and works of artistic craftsmanship, not 2D graphic artworks. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:49, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion, we go with the law here. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:53, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
