User talk:Multichill/Archives/2013/November

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Reminder

Hallo Multichill, ik weet dat je druk bent en ik wil je tot niks verplichten maar ik hoop niet dat deze in vergetelheid komt. --Larsnl (talk) 14:41, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Vera (talk) 20:29, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Missende commonscat links

Hoi Multichill, de volgende pagina is twee weken niet bijgewerkt. Zijn er geen wijziging meer sindsdien of moet er een bot herstart worden? Missende_commonscat_links. Rudolphous (talk) 13:36, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Bedankt! Rudolphous (talk) 12:47, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

A question

Hello. I have seen that you have made the Template:UncategorizedHeader. Currently, Wikimedia Macedonia organizes a competition for best picture, and so far we have more than 800 pictures uploaded. All of these images are in one category, Category:Images from Wiki Loves Cultural Heritage 2013 in Macedonia. My question is, are there any possible ways to create a similar template like yours, for recategorizing our images by date? For example Category:Images from Wiki Loves Cultural Heritage 2013 in Macedonia uploaded on October 30, etc. Can you create one for us? Best--Никола Стоіаноски 12:31, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Standerdmolen, aanzicht - Groenendijk - 20091757 - RCE.jpg

Hi BotMultichill, You placed this RCE-picture of a windmill in the Commons-category Groenendijk (subcategory of Rijnwoude). However, this mill stood in Kloosterzande in the Province of Zeeland. In fact, all the 20 RCE-pictures of windmills you put into the category Groenendijk are wrongly placed there, as none of the mills stands (or ever stood) in Groenendijk. Very uncareful work. Can you please correct it, for all the 20 pics? Thank you! The source-links that you have included(!) give the correct data. Loranchet (talk) 12:57, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Wrongly named category. Fixed, have fun sorting it out. Multichill (talk) 15:02, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Category:Media needing categories in use in galleries

In the Category:Media needing categories in use in galleries there are a lot of old categories. Maybe your bot could do an extra tour. --Nachcommonsverschieber (talk) 11:09, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

File:FS - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg

File:FS - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Niklem (talk) 18:28, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Participation ex meeting - Open Beelden - 44617.ogv

File:Participation ex meeting - Open Beelden - 44617.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--ghouston (talk) 06:40, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

CC 4.0 license text messages

It seems the license texts for CC 4.0 is not ready for translation yet. Would you mind adding those messages to the software? Best regards. – Kwj2772 (talk) 08:25, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, it's on my list to commit. I'll probably do it this weekend. Multichill (talk) 22:10, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Multichill/Archives/2013/November&oldid=121779325"